My film "Stalker" is a horror film and it utilises many conventions from the horror genre in order to convey this to the audience. For example, my film includes a masked, mysterious antagonist that is hardly shown in my trailer in order to raise tension and enigmas in the audience. This is a clichè adopted by many films because it is so effective at enhancing the fear factor of the film as it plays on audience fears of the unknown. Specific examples include The Collector, Saw and Predator. The Hypodermic Needle Theory states that the audience is a passive mass who will immediately accept the version of events presented to them. Applying The Hypodermic Needle Theory to my film, it would mean the audience instantly believing that there is an escaped asylum patient that goes around stalking/killing people and that it could happen to them, further increasing the scariness of the film. The vast majority of horror films are rated 18 because the messages they are conveying are considered to frightening for a younger audience. Due to this, my film is rated 18 also as it contains certain messages which may be unsuitable for children, such as an escaped lunatic going on a murderous rampage.
The Uses and Gratifications theory was popularised by Katz and Blumler, and works as a way of explaining what the audience uses media for as opposed to what the media does to the audience. The theory states that there are 4 main reasons why someone would want to use media; diversion, information, social interaction and personal identity. I believe the audience would want to see my film for the diversion (immersing yourself into media to be entertained and as an escape from their normal lives) and social interaction (so they can talk about the new horror film with their friends and family and not be 'out of the loop') elements. You could also say my film satisfied the simple need from the audience to be entertained through my use of creating enigmas and suspense for the audience.
George Gerbners Cultivation theory states that the longer the audience spends in the world of media the more they believe that what they see is applicable to the real world. For example, the more crime films an audience member watches the more they will believe the world is a violent place and that crimes like the ones they see in the films can be happening round the corner. With my film, Cultivation Theory would believe that it would help to further the audiences fears of being killed or heighten their fears of the unknown as they are both elements my film plays on in order to entertain. The violence-related content contained in my film would link with the 'Mean-World Syndrome' that Gerbner mentions in his theory.
Laura Mulvey coined the phrase "male gaze" in 1975 to describe her theory that films are shot from a heterosexual male perspective and that women are often reduced to objects to be gazed upon in films. She also believes that women need to watch films from the male perspective as events depicted on screen are filmed in the context of a mans reaction to these events. It can be argued that my trailer does conform to the theory of the male gaze, mostly due to the fact that my trailer doesn't flesh out our female characters personalities enough even though they are meant to be the main protagonists/victims of our stalker. Instead they are slightly objectified, only shown screaming and with one line of dialogue between them making it obvious to the audience that they are simply cannon fodder for our film. You could say that this was a consequence of having to prioritise what was shown in the trailer, as with a film called Stalker you want the stalker to be on screen as much as possible in the trailer as that is what will draw audiences in, not finding out what the protagonists pets are called or what jobs they have. So whilst they may seem relatively monotonous for horror victims in our trailer their characters would have been expanded upon in our film so that the audience has characters to sympathise with and root for rather than just people to watch get murdered.
The Utopian Solutions Theory comes from Richard Dyer, and states that audiences consume media to fill the inadequacies in their own lives. Films would therefore gain the best response from an audience member if it provided them solutions to multiple inadequacies. For example, a film like Wolf of Wolf Street is successful because it provides the solution of abundance to audience members problem of poverty. Audience members who feel their lives are boring will enjoy The Expendables because it contrasts to their real-world problem with exciting action-packed plots. Many sit-coms become popular because it provides community to people who feel isolated. My trailer would provide a solution to people who feel their lives are mundane. Audiences would watch my film and they would enjoy the contrast between their own lives and running for your life from a knife-wielding maniac. You could also say that a film in the horror genre, such as mine, almost reverses the Utopian Solutions Theory, as the audience takes enjoyment from watching characters with inadequacies and problems whilst the audience themselves is likely to already have the solution of safety.